Continuum of Engagement by Barbara Bray and Kathleen McClaskey is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Graphic design* by Sylvia Duckworth @sylviaduckworth https://goo.gl/s2kZ3w
The Continuum of Engagement was created to provide the characteristics of the learners as they move from being passive about learning to be in the flow. How do we know learners are engaged? Step up the ladder to see how a learner moves from compliant to flow so you can picture what it looks and sounds like in a classroom when learners start engaging in the learning process. When you walk in a classroom, you might be able to see and hear engagement or the lack of it.
In the Compliant level, the teacher is probably following the curriculum and doing what they know or learned in their teacher education program or as a learner themselves. If a teacher is directing the learning, it might be to introduce a topic or to deliver instruction. Activities may be determined by the lesson or the pacing guide. The teacher prepared the lesson, created or used existing materials to put on the walls, and assigned seating based on the seating chart. Learners are supposed to follow directions from the teacher and are not directed to talk about their learning.
When learners are in the Commit level, you will see learners in pairs, groups, or working individually. The teacher may still be laying the groundwork for learning and determining prior knowledge at this level, but learners are more involved in what they learn. There will be more examples of student work on the walls. You may see the teacher walking around the room or sitting with one learner or with a group. This is the level where the teacher is starting to build the relationship with the learners. The learners start taking responsibility for some of the tasks or skills they need to learn.
When learners are on the Connect level, there is more noise in the classroom. You will see learners moving around the room, some standing, and others maybe even sitting on the floor or hall. The teacher may be doing the same as what they did at the Commit level but now the room is noisier in some areas and quieter in others. The learners are doing more of the talking than the teacher. This is where learners enjoy learning from each other and even teaching their peers. Learners are becoming more curious by generating questions and investigating solutions to challenges, issues, and problems.
When learners are in the Flow, this is called “messy learning” and may seem chaotic to some people. There is no way to capture what it might look like. You may have a few learners in the hall, one on a phone contacting a mentor, two sitting together animated, a small group brainstorming in the corner, and someone presenting their evidence to others for feedback. This is when learners are pursuing their interests, are curious and seeking what they are passionate about. You can hear it in their voices and actions. They know how to set goals and monitor their progress. They want to share what they learn. They are motivated to learn and take greater responsibility for their own learning. The teacher is guiding the process. Several teachers have noted that when their kids are in the flow, “they never want to go back to the traditional way of teaching.”
Deeper into Engagement and Flow…
Engagement is the affective side of learning and has been found to be a robust predictor of learner performance and behavior in the classroom. (Martin-Kniep, 2012) Engagement refers to the degree of attention, curiosity, interest, optimism, and passion that learners show when they are learning or being taught. When learners have a choice in what they are learning especially if it is something they are passionate about or interested in, they jump in and sometimes get lost in the task or project. This is called “flow” and you can see and hear the engagement.
The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row]
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi is best known as the architect of the theory of flow. Flow is when a person is fully immersed in what they are doing and there is a balance between the challenge of the task and the skill of the learner. Flow cannot occur if the task is too easy or too difficult. Csíkszentmihályi published the graph below that depicts the relationship between the challenges of a task and skills. Flow only occurs when the activity is a higher-than-average challenge and requires above-average skills. Both skill level and challenge level must be matched and high; if skill and challenge are low and matched, then apathy results. (Csíkszentmihályi, 1990)
Some questions for you to respond below:
Have you experienced flow?
Where are you in the Continuum of Engagement?
What about your learners in your classroom?
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York. Harper & Row.
Martin-Kniep, G. (2012) 27. Neuroscience of engagement and SCARF: why they matter to school.
*Thank You to Sylvia Duckworth @sylviaduckworth from Crescent School, Toronto, Canada for designing the graphic of the Continuum of Engagement 3/6/2016. Please make sure you visit http://sylviaduckworth.com for all of her graphics and permission to use any of these graphics.